All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
< Previous: Annex 3 |
Table of contents | > Next: Annex 5 |
The EU has a long-term goal of reducing Europe's GHG emissions by 80 % by 2050, compared with 1990 levels. In the context of its commitments and the negotiations at international level, in March 2007 the European Council committed the EU to becoming a highly energy-efficient, low-carbon economy by achieving three domestic climate and energy objectives by 2020 (Council of the European Union, 2007):
To achieve these domestic commitments, in 2009, the EU adopted the climate and energy package, which comprises various pieces of legislation (EU, 2009a, 2009c, 2009d, 2009e, 2009f). The package introduced a clear approach to achieving the 20 % reduction in total GHG emissions, compared with 1990 levels, which is equivalent to a 14 % reduction compared with 2005 levels. This 14 % reduction objective is to be achieved through a 21 % reduction compared with 2005 levels for emissions covered by the ETS, and a 9 % reduction for sectors covered by the ESD (EU, 2009c).
A revision of the ETS Directive (EU, 2009a) introduced a single 2020 target for all EU emissions covered by the EU ETS (as well as ETS emissions from the three participating non-Member States, namely Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway). The ETS essentially covers emissions from large industrial installations, as well as emissions from aviation. ETS emissions represent about 40-45 % of total EU GHG emissions. The 2020 cap corresponds to a reduction of about 21 % in ETS emissions by 2020, compared with 2005 levels. The sectors covered under the EU ETS are therefore expected to contribute the largest proportion of emission reductions in the context of meeting the EU's 2020 GHG emissions target. For allowances allocated to the EU ETS sectors, annual caps have been set for the period from 2013 to 2020; these decrease by 1.74 % annually. For further details on the EU ETS in the period 2013-2020, see EEA, 2017k.
For all other emissions not covered by the EU ETS, the ESD has set annual binding targets for each year of the period between 2013 and 2020, for each Member State.
These EU-internal rules under the '2020 climate and energy package' underpin the EU implementation of the 2020 target under the UNFCCC (see Annex 5).
To ensure that the EU is cost-effectively attaining its long-term objective, EU leaders agreed, in October 2014, on a 2030 climate and energy policy framework for the EU, and endorsed the following targets (European Council, 2014):
Neither the renewable energy target nor the energy efficiency target will be translated into nationally binding targets. Individual Member States are free to set their own higher national targets.
These targets for 2030 were submitted to the UNFCCC on 6 March 2015 as an INDC for the Paris Agreement of December 2015.
The European Commission proposed in 2016 to integrate the LULUCF sector into the EU 2030 climate and energy framework from 2021 onwards. The current proposal (EC, 2016i) suggests a 'no debit rule' requiring each Member State to compensate net accounted emissions from the LULUCF sector by emission reductions in Effort Sharing sectors (see Section 2.5). The proposal also includes modified accounting rules.
The adoption of the Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy (EC, 2015b) underlined the importance of meeting the 2030 targets, as 'Energy Union and Climate' was identified as one of 10 priorities at the start of the Juncker Commission's term. This priority comprises five 'dimensions' (i.e. 'supply security', 'a fully integrated internal energy market', 'energy efficiency', 'climate action — emission reduction' and 'research and innovation'), which have been henceforth reported on annually in the State of the Energy Union (latest report from 2017: EC, 2017c). The annual reporting of progress is considered essential so that issues can be identified in a timely fashion and addressed, if necessary, through further policy interventions.
The ESD covers emissions from all sources outside the EU ETS, except for emissions from aviation [1] and international maritime transport, and net emissions from LULUCF. The ESD therefore includes a range of diffuse sources in a wide range of sectors such as transport (cars, trucks), buildings (in particular heating), services, small industrial installations, agriculture and waste. Such sources currently account for almost 60 % of total GHG emissions in the EU.
The ESD sets individual annual binding targets for GHG emissions not covered by the EU ETS for all Member States for the period from 2013 to 2020 (AEAs) (EU, 2009c). In 2013, the European Commission determined the AEAs of Member States for the period from 2013 to 2020, using reviewed and verified emission data for the years 2005, 2008, 2009 and 2010 (EU, 2013a). The AEAs were adjusted in 2013 to reflect the change in ETS scope from 2013 onwards (EU, 2013b) [2] and in 2017 to reflect updates in methodologies for reporting of GHG inventories (EU, 2017b).
Each Member State will contribute to this effort, according to its relative wealth in terms of GDP per capita. The national emission targets range from a 20 % reduction for the richest Member States to a 20 % increase for the poorest ones by 2020, compared with 2005 levels (see Figure A4.1). At EU level, this will deliver approximately 9.3 % emission reductions by 2020, compared with 2005 levels, from those sectors covered by the ESD. The least wealthy countries are allowed to increase emissions in these sectors because their relatively high economic growth is likely to be accompanied by higher emissions. Nevertheless, their targets still represent a limit on emissions, and a reduction effort will be required by all Member States; they will need to introduce policies and measures to limit or lower their emissions in the various ESD sectors.
On 20 July 2016, the European Commission presented a legislative proposal, the 'Effort Sharing Regulation', which sets out binding annual GHG emission targets for Member States for the period 2021-2030 (EC, 2016g). The proposal is the follow-up to the ESD, which established national emission targets for Member States in Effort Sharing sectors between 2013 and 2020. The proposal recognises the different capacities of Member States to take action by differentiating targets according to GDP per capita across Member States. This ensures fairness because Member States with the highest incomes take on more ambitious targets than Member States with lower incomes. EU leaders recognised that an approach for high-income Member States based solely on relative GDP per capita would mean that, for some, the costs associated with reaching their targets would be relatively high. To address this, these targets have been adjusted to reflect cost-effectiveness for Member States with an above average GDP per capita. In line with the guidance of the European Council, the resulting 2030 GHG emission targets range from 0 % to –40 %, compared with 2005 levels (see Figure A4.1).
The ESD allows Member States to use flexibility provisions to meet their annual targets, with certain limitations:
Member States may use emission credits from the Kyoto Protocol's flexible mechanisms in accordance with the following provisions:
Overall, a maximum of Kyoto emission credits equivalent to 750 Mt CO2 at EU level can be used during the period 2013-2020. As most Member States are expected to meet their ESD targets (see Section 3.1) without the flexibility provisions, while other Member States can meet their ESD targets through intra-EU transfers of AEAs, the use of project credits is expected to be significantly smaller.
Any Member State exceeding its annual AEA, even after taking into account the flexibility provisions and the use of Kyoto Protocol emission credits, will have to take corrective measures as laid down in the ESD and will be subject to the following consequences:
The proposed 'Effort Sharing Regulation' for 2030 targets maintain existing flexibilities under the current ESD (e.g. banking, borrowing, buying and selling) and provides two new flexibilities to allow for a fair and cost-efficient achievement of the targets. These new flexibilities are as follows:
Notes: The targets are expressed relative to 2005 ESD base-year emissions. These base-year emissions are calculated on the basis of relative and absolute 2020 targets (for details on ESD base-year emissions, please see Section A1.2 in Annex 1).
The absolute 2020 and 2013 targets used for the calculations are consistent with the global warming values in the IPCC AR4 (IPCC, 2007) and take into account the change in the scope of the ETS from the second to the third period (2013 to 2020).
Sources: EC, 2016g; EU, 2009c.
To meet its target of increasing the use of RES to 20 % of gross final energy consumption by 2020, the EU adopted the RED (EU, 2009d) as part of the climate and energy package.
The RED includes legally binding national renewable energy targets for 2020, consistent with an EU-wide target of increasing RES use to 20 % of gross final energy consumption by 2020, and to 10 % of transport-related fuel consumption by the same year (EU, 2009c). The RED also sets an indicative trajectory for each Member State for the period 2011-2018, intended to ensure that each Member State achieves its 2020 targets. An interim indicative RED target for the EU can be derived from the minimum indicative trajectories of the Member States in the run-up to 2020 (RED, Annex I, Part B).
Under the RED, Member States had to submit NREAPs in 2010 (EEA, 2011). These plans outline the pathways (i.e. the expected trajectories) that Member States anticipate using to reach their legally binding national renewable energy targets by 2020. In 2011 (and every 2 years thereafter), Member States had to report on national progress towards the interim RED and expected NREAP targets. The NREAPs adopted by Member States in 2010 outline the expected trajectories for RES use, as a proportion of gross final energy consumption, towards the legally binding national 2020 RES targets.
In contrast, no national targets for renewable energy have been set for 2030.
Notes: The targets for Iceland and Norway, which are not EU Member States, were agreed and are included in the annex of the European Economic Area agreement. For the sake of simplicity, the report refers to these as RED targets.
RES, renewable energy source.
Source: EU, 2009d.
In 2007, the European Council stressed the need to increase energy efficiency to achieve the 20 % energy savings target for 2020, for primary energy consumption, and agreed on binding targets for GHG emission reductions and renewable energy (Council of the European Union, 2007). The reduction of primary energy consumption by 20 % by 2020 is a non-binding objective in the EU.
The climate and energy package does not address the energy efficiency target directly, although the CO2 performance standards for cars and vans (EU, 2009f, 2014a), the revised EU ETS Directive and the ESD all contribute to fostering energy efficiency. Since the adoption of the package, the EU energy efficiency policy framework has advanced in line with the priorities identified in the Action Plan for Energy Efficiency 2006 (EC, 2006). The energy efficiency action plan was reviewed in 2011, after revisions of the following pieces of legislation:
One of the key developments in the energy efficiency policy framework was the adoption of the EED in 2012 (EU, 2012). The EED establishes a common framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency within the EU and aims to help remove barriers and overcome market failures that impede efficiency in the supply and use of energy. The EED stipulates that primary energy consumption in the EU should not exceed 1 483 Mtoe in 2020, and that final energy consumption in the EU should not exceed 1 086 Mtoe in 2020. These absolute targets were set using the European Commission’s 2007 Energy Baseline Scenario (EC, 2008), based on the Price-driven and Agent-based Simulation of Markets Energy System Models (PRIMES). Implementing the EED was expected to lead to a 15 % reduction in primary energy consumption compared with the 2007 Energy Baseline Scenario, with an additional 2 % reduction expected from the transport sector (Groenenberg, 2012).
Under the EED, Member States had to set indicative national targets and implement a set of mandatory requirements, one of the most significant being the establishment of an Energy Efficiency Obligation (EEO) scheme, or the implementation of alternative measures.
Member States have adopted various base years against which the progress towards national energy efficiency targets will be measured. Member States also chose different approaches for setting national targets. A total of 10 Member States (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Denmark, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malta and Poland) chose to focus their targets on primary energy consumption, while 12 (Croatia, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Slovakia, Slovenia and the United Kingdom) chose to focus their national targets on gross final energy consumption. Another two (Bulgaria and Sweden) have focused on primary energy intensity. Each national target reflects the specific situation of the Member State that adopted it. As a consequence, ambition levels vary greatly. Compared with 2005 levels, currently 18 Member States have aimed to reduce final as well as primary energy consumption; for six Member States, targets show an increase in final as well as primary energy consumption. Four other Member States intend to keep the potential increase in either primary or final energy consumption to a certain limit over the period.
In some Member States, the targets are still subject to change. This is because some countries are currently holding nationwide debates on the future of their energy systems and they are allowed to adjust their targets when they review their triennial NEEAPs submitted under the EED. In fact, in 2017, 18 Member States had submitted their revised NEEAPs before the finalising of this report.
Figure A4.3 shows the national targets set by each Member State under the EED, compared with 2005 levels, for primary and final energy consumption. The year 2005 is used here to serve as a common reference, although the EED does not explicitly use it as a common base year.
In contrast, no national targets for energy efficiency have been set for 2030 (see Section 1.2).
Note: The national targets for 2020 reported by Member States under the EED were first calculated in absolute terms and then compared with 2005 levels.
Sources: EC, 2015c, 2017d, 2017e; EU, 2012; Eurostat, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c.
The main targets that apply to Member States under international and EU commitments are presented in Table A4.1. The scope of existing EU legislation that implements a domestic 20 % target commitment is different from that of the Kyoto target for the second commitment period. For this reason, the total allowed emissions or the ‘emissions budget’ under the climate and energy package cannot be directly compared with the corresponding quantified emission limitation or reduction commitment (QELRC). Some of the main differences between the climate and energy package and the second commitment period, in terms of emissions included and the methodologies used to determine emissions, relate to the treatment of emissions from international aviation, emissions and removals from LULUCF, the use of units from flexible mechanisms, the coverage of NF3, flexibilities regarding base years and the use of GWP. The differences are summarised in Table A4.5. For details, please see EEA, 2014b, as well as Annex 5.
|
Participating in EU ETS |
ETS target (2020) |
ESD target (2020) |
2020 ESD emission allocation |
2005 ESD base-year emissions |
Renewable target 2020 (RED) |
Primary energy target 2020 |
Final energy target 2020 |
|
|
% vs. 2005 |
Mt |
% gross final energy consumption |
Mtoe |
|||
EU-28 |
|
-21 |
9 |
2 618.2 |
2 887.1 |
20 |
1 483 |
1 086 |
Austria |
x |
|
-16 |
47.8 |
56.8 |
34 |
32 |
25 |
Belgium |
x |
|
-15 |
68.2 |
80.3 |
13 |
44 |
33 |
Bulgaria |
Since 2007 |
|
20 |
26.5 |
22.1 |
16 |
17 |
9 |
Croatia |
Since 2013 |
|
11 |
19.3 |
17.4 |
20 |
11 |
7 |
Cyprus |
x |
|
-5 |
4.0 |
4.2 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
Czech Republic |
x |
|
9 |
67.2 |
61.7 |
13 |
44 |
25 |
Denmark (a) |
x |
|
-20 |
32.1 |
40.1 |
30 |
17 |
14 |
Estonia |
x |
|
11 |
6.0 |
5.4 |
25 |
7 |
3 |
Finland |
x |
|
-16 |
28.5 |
33.9 |
38 |
36 |
27 |
France |
x |
|
-14 |
342.5 |
398.2 |
23 |
220 |
131 |
Germany |
x |
|
-14 |
410.9 |
477.8 |
18 |
277 |
194 |
Greece |
x |
|
-4 |
60.0 |
62.6 |
18 |
25 |
18 |
Hungary |
x |
|
10 |
52.8 |
48.0 |
13 |
24 |
14 |
Ireland |
x |
|
-20 |
37.7 |
47.1 |
16 |
15 |
13 |
Italy |
x |
|
-13 |
291.0 |
334.5 |
17 |
158 |
124 |
Latvia |
x |
|
17 |
10.0 |
8.5 |
40 |
5 |
5 |
Lithuania |
x |
|
15 |
15.2 |
13.3 |
23 |
7 |
4 |
Luxembourg |
x |
|
-20 |
8.1 |
10.1 |
11 |
5 |
4 |
Malta |
x |
|
5 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
Netherlands |
x |
|
-16 |
107.4 |
127.8 |
14 |
58 |
52,2 |
Poland |
x |
|
14 |
205.2 |
180.0 |
15 |
96 |
72 |
Portugal |
x |
|
1 |
49.1 |
48.6 |
31 |
23 |
17 |
Romania |
Since 2007 |
|
19 |
89.8 |
75.5 |
24 |
43 |
30 |
Slovakia |
x |
|
13 |
25.9 |
23.0 |
14 % |
16 |
9 |
Slovenia |
x |
|
4 |
12.3 |
11.8 |
25 |
7 |
5 |
Spain |
x |
|
-10 |
212.4 |
236.0 |
20 |
123 |
87 |
Sweden |
x |
|
-17 |
36.1 |
43.5 |
49 |
48 |
32 |
United Kingdom (a) |
x |
|
-16 |
350.9 |
417.8 |
15 |
180 |
132 |
EEA member countries |
||||||||
Iceland |
Since 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liechtenstein |
Since 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norway |
Since 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switzerland |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turkey |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: (a) The Faroe Islands and Greenland (Denmark), and the United Kingdom’s overseas territories, are not part of the EU and therefore are not covered by the targets presented here.
ESD, Effort Sharing Decision; EU ETS, European Union Emissions Trading System; Mtoe, million tonnes of oil equivalent; RED, Renewable Energy Directive.
Sources: EC, 2017d; EU, 2009a, 2009c, 2009d, 2012, 2013a, 2013b.
< Previous: Annex 3 |
Report table of contents |
> Next: Annex 5 |
[1] Emissions from aviation have been included in the EU ETS since 1 January 2012. In principle, the EU ETS should cover all flights departing from and/or arriving at airports in all EU Member States, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway and closely related territories. However, since 2012, only flights departing from and arriving at airports located in these countries (and Switzerland in 2012) have been included in the EU ETS. Non-CO2 emissions from domestic aviation remain covered under the ESD. > Back
[2] According to Article 27(2) of Regulation (EU) 525/2013, the European Commission is to examine the impact of the use of the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national GHG inventories and significant changes brought about by the UNFCCC methodologies by December 2016, and may revise Member States' AEAs, as provided in the ESD, accordingly. > Back
For references, please go to https://eea.europa.eu./themes/climate/trends-and-projections-in-europe/trends-and-projections-in-europe-2017/annexes/annex-4 or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 23 Dec 2024, 03:40 PM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others