Review of
CORINAIR 90
Proposals for Air Emissions 1994
Topic report 6/96
by
Simon Eggleston
European Topic Centre on Air Emissions
November 1996
This report was prepared under the
supervision of Gordon McInnes, Project Manager,
European Environment Agency |
|
Download the report as PDF File [302 Kb]
CORINAIR is a programme to establish an
inventory of emissions of air pollutants in Europe. It was initiated by the European
Environment Agency Task Force and was part of the CORINE (COoRdination d'INformation
Environmentale) work programme set up by the European Council of Ministers in 1985.
End of 1994 the EEAs European Topic
Centre on Air Emissions (ETC/AEM) took over the CORINAIR programme and finalised several
reports on the results of CORINAIR1990. The results of CORINAIR1990 provided the most
detailed, complete, consistent and transparent European air emission inventory.
There still remained gaps and inconsistencies
in CORINAIR90 and the process to deliver the final data took too long. This report
presents the results of a review of CORINAIR90 and gives detailed proposals for
improvements, e.g. : give priority to nationals totals which are split in the same
detailed source nomenclature (SNAP) for different reporting purposes (UNECE/EMEP,
UN-FCCC/IPCC), collect and report (preliminary) data within twelve months, make use of
consistent energy statistics, improve the software, give intensive assistance to
participating countries. The proposals were followed by another report
"Recommendations for Revised Data System for Air Emission Inventories". In 1996
the ETC/AEM started the 1994 air emission inventory making use new software, which was
improved based on the two reports mentioned.
Table of contents |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1. INTRODUCTION |
2. AIMS
|
3. OVERVIEW OF THE CORINAIR 90 PROCESS
3.1 Achievements of CORINAIR 90.
3.2 National Approaches to CORINAIR 90
3.3 Time Taken to Complete the Project
|
4. REVIEW OF CORINAIR 90
4.1 Software Usability
4.2 Urban/Regional/National Data.
4.3 Comparisons with Energy Balances
4.4 Prioritisation of Information.
4.5 SNAP Codes
4.6 CORINAIR Inconsistencies
4.7 Confidentiality
4.8 COPERT
|
5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE EUROPEAN EMISSION
INVENTORIES
5.1 Pollution Emission Registers
5.2 New Pollutants
5.3 National and International Obligations
|
6. PRIORITIES
6.1 Inventory Aims
6.2 Emissions Data
6.3 Principles
|
7. INVENTORY PROCESS TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS
7.1 Stage 1 - National Figures
7.1.1 Step 1 - the first six months
7.1.2 Step 2 - from July to December
7.1.3 Step 3 - the second year
7.2 Stage 2 - Geographic Data
7.3 Stage 3 - Development
7.4 Timetable
7.5 Products: The Supply of Information on European
Emissions
7.5.1 System Outputs
7.5.2 Emissions Inventory Topic Centre Data Outputs
7.5.3 Emissions Inventory Topic Centre Reports
|
8. CONCLUSIONS |
GLOSSARY
|
ANNEXES
A ANALYSIS OF
QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
B CHARACTERISTICS OF CORINAIR 90 DATABASES
C NATIONAL CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIREMENTS
D PROPOSED SOFTWARE CHANGES FOR Air Emissions '94
|
Note:
In order to reduce confusion in this document
between the past and future European inventories this document uses the terms CORINAIR 90
to describe the inventory being completed for 1990 under the CORINE programme, and Air
Emissions '94 to describe the proposed inventory for Europe for the year 1994. However it
is recommended that due to its familiarity and in order to emphasise the continuity of the
exercise, the CORINAIR name is retained for future inventories.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CORINAIR 90 was initiated by the European
Environment Agency Task Force to produce an European emission inventory. Its scope was
wider than the EC countries at that time and now covers 31 countries. Now the European
Environment Agency (EEA) wishes to continue with this inventory work and has set up a
Topic Centre on Air Emissions. The first task of this Topic Centre is to review CORINAIR
90 and make proposals for the future, in particular for Air Emissions '94, the next
proposed European emission inventory. The main points of this report are:-
- CORINAIR 90 has achieved a new level of
co-operation and collaboration in this area of work. It has achieved agreement of
classification and on default approaches to the different emission sources. It is now
producing data for 1990 which give emission estimates with higher levels of consistency
and comparability than those achieved before. A source classification system, SNAP
(Selected Nomenclature for Air Pollution), has been agreed with the result that emission
estimates are now becoming available in greater detail than before.
- There are a number of problems with CORINAIR
90. The main one is the time taken to complete the inventories. Only now, in 1995, are
1990 estimates becoming widely available.
- There are also a number of detailed points
relating to the SNAP codes and consistency of use that need to be addressed. These are
discussed in the report.
- A review of users needs indicates that
there are a number of priority needs. In particular national level data is needed on a
short time-scale. The EU requires CO2 estimates within 7 months. Some countries
can already meet this deadline and it is proposed that the Topic Centre assists other
countries to reach the same reporting speeds.
- It is proposed that inventories are collected
annually with national level data being available within six months for some data and 12
months for a wider range. In the next year the spatial detail is collected and the
estimates broadened to a wider range of pollutants. Thus the whole process is completed
within 24 months with some data available at 6 and 12 months. The report gives the detail
of this process.
- An important point is that some of this data
will be provisional. In the past some countries have not wished to release provisional
information and then revise it later. However the time-scales clearly indicate that final
data will not be available to meet user requirements. Inventory data, by their very
nature, are estimates. They can never be regarded as final figures as they may be improved
at any time, thus data suppliers and users must realise that they are the best estimate
available by a given deadline.
- This report also identifies a range of
development tasks that need to be carried out. These range from improvement of the SNAP
codes and software changes to urban emissions inventories and validation activities. These
will need to progress in parallel with the data collection work. Some of these development
tasks will need to progress in collaboration with others such as EUROSTAT (for SNAP) and
the EMEP/CORINAIR guidebook and UNECE Task Force on Emission Inventories for
methodological improvements.
- This report has identified a number of issues
where further work is needed to clarify final solutions, e.g. in the treatment of
confidential data.
- The Air Emissions Topic Centre will need to
give much greater training and assistance to each country to ensure the speedy completion
of the data collection tasks. This will require careful management to ensure that the
development work and the data collection activities proceed in a timely and efficient
fashion. In addition, there appears to be a number of tasks that will be subcontracted
outside the Air Emissions Topic Centre to ensure they are completed on time in a cost
effective way.
Document Actions
Share with others