All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Indicator Assessment
According to the official data submitted to the UNFCCC in 2012 GHG emissions amounted to 4 522Mt CO2 eq. in the EU-28, of which about 80% accounts for the emissions of the EU-15 (3619 Mt CO2 eq.)(Figure 1).
Between 2011 and 2012 GHG emissions have decreased in most of the main categories. Energy accounted for 65% of this emission reduction. The 1.1 % decrease in CO2 emissions from energy in EU-28 in 2012 came along with economic recession across the EU as a whole. Half the EU member states experienced negative economic growth in 2012. In the other half, positive economic growth in 2012 was lower than in 2011. The winter in Europe was on average colder in 2012 than in 2011 leading to higher heating demand and emissions from households. However, higher residential emissions did not offset much lower emissions in other sectors such as transport and industry. Also, the increase in coal use in 2012 did not offset a much larger decrease in the consumption of oil natural gas. There was also a substantial increase in renewable energy in 2012, continuing the long-term trend observed since 1990. A detailed description of the 2011-2012 changes in GHG emissions is provided in the EEA analyis ‘Why did greenhouse gas emissions decrease in the EU between 2011 and 2012?’.
Between 1990 and 2012, total GHG emissions:
The emission reduction of 15.1% (646 Mt CO2 eq.) in 2012 since its base year’s levels, and an average reduction of -11.8% during the whole 1st Commitment period (CP1, 2008-2012) indicates that the EU-15 is in compliance with its common -8% target, although full clarity on the final compliance will only be available in 2015.
According to the latest ‘Trends and Projections’ report, published in October 2013, with the current set of existing measures in place, the EU-28 is projected to reach a level in 2020 which is 21% below 1990 levels, which is below its 20 % unilateral reduction target (including emissions from international aviation).
At a sectoral level, the largest GHG emission reductions between 1990 and 2012 have been observed in the manufacturing industries and construction IPCC sector (327 Mt CO2 eq or 38.1%) and in the energy industries IPCC sector (267 Mt CO2 eq or 15.9%), in particular for emissions related to the production of electricity and heat. Emissions from the residential/commercial sector have also fallen substantially, despite the growth in the number of private households and the increase in population. This decrease in emissions was mainly due to the increased use of gas and biomass compared to the use liquid and solid fuels.
Transport emissions increased continuously between 1990 and 2007 and have decreased in the last five years. In 2012 CO2 emissions from transport had increased by 14.1% compared to 1990 and accounted for 19.7% of total EU-28 GHG emissions. CO2 emissions from road transportation is the main category accounting for more than 90% of the total emissions from this sector (excluding emissions from international aviation and shipping). Emissions from international aviation and maritime transport increased by 278 Mt CO2 eq between 1990 and 2012. EU GHG emissions from international aviation remained lower than those from the shipping sector, but have been growing more rapidly.
In 2012, GHG emissions from the industrial processes IPCC sector were 30.6 % below 1990 levels. This was mainly due to the decrease of CO2 emissions from cement and iron & steel production (by 28.0 Mt and 30.4 Mt CO2 respectively) and the decrease of N2O emissions from chemical industry (104.0 Mt CO2 eq). However HFC emissions have been continuously increasing since 2000. This can be explained by their increased use in refrigeration and air conditioning equipment, in replacement of ozone-depleting CFCs, which were gradually phased out in the 1990s.
The agriculture and waste IPCC sectors have also experienced important changes since 1990, with reduction of 24% and 31.5%, respectively. These two sectors accounted in 2012 for 10.3% and 3.1% of total EU GHG emissions, respectively. The main reductions from these sectors were due to reduced fertiliser use, leading to decreased levels of N2O emissions and inproved recovery of landfill gas, which led to lower emissions of CH4.
Figure 2 presents the change per IPCC sector between 1990 and 2012, as well as the contribution of each main sector to the total GHG emissions in 2012. A detailed description of the 1990-2012 emission trends is provided in the EEA analyis ‘Why did greenhouse gas emissions decrease in the EU between 1990 and 2012?’.
Current progress of EU countries towards their Kyoto targets
The EU-decrease in GHG emissions fully reflects the mitigating efforts of its Member States.
Almost 50% of the net EU-28 decrease in GHG emissions in 2012 results from the emission reduction in Germany and the United Kingdom (25.5% and 25.2% respectively, compared to 1990 levels). The main reason for the favourable trend in Germany were increasing efficiency in power and heating plants, as well as the economic restructuring of the five new Länder after German reunification. In the UK the liberalising of energy markets and the subsequent fuel switch from oil and coal to gas have led to the important decrease in emissions. On the other end, in eight Member States 2012 emissions levels were higher than in 1990. The largest increases have been observed in Spain (20%), despite the rapid deployment of renewable energy technologies.
Twenty-six EU Member States (all except Cyprus and Malta), Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland have individual GHG reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol CP1. Most of these countries had limited or reduced their GHG emissions below their target level by the end of the first commitment period (Figure 3).
The EU-15, i.e. the 15 pre-2004 EU Member States has a common 8% reduction target to be achieved collectively under the ‘burden-sharing agreement’, which sets differentiated emission reduction targets for each EU-15 Member State. With average 2008-2012 GHG emissions lower than base-year emissions by 505.3 Mt CO2 eq (-11.8%), the EU-15 is well on track towards achieving its target.
The overall progress of the countries will be presented in the EEA technical report ‘Progress towards 2008-2012 Kyoto targets in Europe’, which is planned for publication in summer 2014.
EU progress towards the 2020 targets
Under the ‘Climate and Energy Package’, adopted in 2009, the EU committed to a unilateral emission reduction target of 20% by 2020 compared to 1990 which corresponds to a 14% decrease from 2005 levels. The main two instruments for achieving this target are:
Average 2008-2012 ETS emissions were on average 9% lower than in 2005 in the EU-27 (Croatia entered the EU ETS in 2013). In 2012 the share of ETS emissions in total GHG emissions was 41% (Figure 4).
The progress of the ETS sector towards its 2020 target will be further analysed in October 2014, together with the publication of the annual Trends and Projections report.
Progress of EU countries towards their ESD targets
Under the ESD, Member States are required to limit their greenhouse gas emissions not covered by the EU ETS between 2013 and 2020 by meeting binding annual limits. The annual targets – known as annual emission allocations (AEAs) - follow a straight line between a defined starting point in 2013 and the target for 2020.
The assessment of current progress towards the ESD targets compares the 2012 non-ETS emissions with the 2013 and 2020 national targets. According to the latest inventory data, all Member States except for Luxembourg and Poland were below their 2013 target in 2012 (Figure 5).
Projections reported by Member States show that a number of them will need to strengthen their efforts in order to achieve their 2020 target. Member States can still meet their targets through the use of flexibility options provided by the ESD, whereby transfers of AEAs between years and between Member States are allowed, as well as the limited use of project-based credits from two of the flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol: the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and the Joint Implementation.
In July 2014, Member States will report approximated GHG inventories for the year 2013. This data will allow for a comparison of 2013 emission levels with 2013 ESD targets. This analysis, together with a detailed assessment of progress towards climate and energy targets in the EU, will be presented in in the EEA 'Trends and Projections report'. This report is scheduled to be published in October 2014.
The present indicator (CSI010) presents total and sectoral trends of anthropogenic GHG emissions in Europe from 1990 onwards and assesses the progress of the EU, individual Member States and other EEA countries towards their GHG targets.
The indicator provides information on emissions from the main anthropogenic GHG sources, distributed by main emitting sectors, according to the IPCC nomenclature. In addition, the indicator shows the past and projected GHG emissions in the ETS and non ETS sector, in accordance with the EU legal scheme.
Unless otherwise mentioned, the indicator does not cover emissions from international bunkers (international aviation and maritime transport), which are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol. In particular, these emissions are not taken into account in the total GHG emissions reported at national and EU levels.
Emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) are not included in total national greenhouse gas emissions.
Geographical area
The indicator covers all 28 Member States of the European Union. Some figures also include information concerning other EEA Member States.
Period covered
The indicator covers annual emissions since 1990.
Greenhouse gas emissions are expressed in 'million tonnes CO2-equivalent' (Mt CO2-eq.)
The UNFCCC sets an ultimate objective of stabilizing GHG concentrations 'at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human induced) interference with the climate system.' It also requires precise and regularly updated inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from industrialized countries.
The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the UNFCCC, which sets binding targets for industrialized countries and the European Union for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It runs in two commitment periods; the first one started in 2008 and ended in 2012, whereas the second started in 2013 and will end in 2020. The EU and its Member States have signed up to the Protocol.
The European Union, as a party to the UNFCCC and to the Protocol, reports annually on the greenhouse gas emissions within the area covered by its Member States. The Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory and inventory report, officially submitted to the UNFCCC Secretariat, is prepared on behalf of the European Commission (DG Clima) by the EEA and it's European Environment Agency's European Topic Centre for Air and Climate Mitigation (ETC/ACM), supported by the Joint Research Centre and Eurostat.
In 2007, EU leaders committed to a 20% reduction of EU's GHG emissions by 2020 on the basis of the 1990 GHG emissions (14% decrease in GHG emissions between 2005 and 2020). The EU has also committed to increase to 20 % the share of renewable energies in the EU final energy consumption (with a minimum 10 % share in the transport sector) and to save 20 % of the EU’s energy consumption through increased energy efficiency (“20-20-20” objective).
The EU Climate and Energy Package adopted in 2009 sets a legislative framework to achieve the 20% GHG emissions reduction objective in a two-fold way: a 21% reduction of emissions covered under the EU ETS compared to 2005 levels, to be achieved across the whole EU, and an effort to reduce emissions not covered by the EU ETS by about 10% compared to 2005 levels, shared between the EU-28 Member States through differentiated annual national GHG targets under the Effort Sharing Decision (ESD).
The current indicator aims to present an assessment of progress of the EU and the individual countries towards their international and national targets, under the Kyoto Protocol (in both commitment periods: 2008-2012 and 2013-2020) and under the ESD respectively. The indicator is based on the official GHG inventories submitted by the EEA countries and the EU to the UNFCCC as well as on the projected GHG emissions submitted by the Member States under the Monitoring Mechanism Regulation (Regulation 525/2013, MMR). In order to calculate the distance to the national ESD targets, emissions reported in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) are also taken into account.
First commitment period (CP1), 2008-2012
For the first commitment period (2008-2012), the 15 States who were EU members in 1997, when the Kyoto Protocol was adopted, took on an 8% reduction from base year target that has been redistributed among themselves, taking advantage of a scheme under the Protocol known as a “bubble”, whereby countries have different individual targets, but which combined make an overall target for that group of countries. The differentiated targets are set out in the Annex II to the Council Decision 2002/358/EC concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder.
Under the Kyoto Protocol, the other (non EU-15) Member States (apart from Cyprus and Malta) have individual targets. Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovak Republic and Slovenia have reduction targets of 8 % from the base year, while Hungary and Poland have reduction targets of 6 % and Croatia has a reduction target of 5 %. Of the additional EEA member countries, Norway and Iceland are allowed to increase emissions under the Kyoto Protocol by 1 % and 10 %, respectively, from their base-year emissions. Switzerland and Liechtenstein have reduction targets of 8 %. Turkey is a Party to the Kyoto Protocol but has no reduction target.
The national Kyoto or burden-sharing targets for CP1 are calculated on the basis of the base-year emissions and are as follows:
Country | Kyoto Target 2008-2012 |
---|---|
Austria |
-13% |
Belgium |
-7.5% |
Bulgaria [1] |
-8.0% |
Croatia |
-5.0% |
Czech Republic |
-8.0% |
Cyprus |
- |
Denmark [2] |
-21.0% |
Estonia |
-8.0% |
Finland |
0% |
France |
0% |
Germany |
-21.0% |
Greece |
+25.0% |
Hungary [3] |
-6.0% |
Iceland |
-10.0% |
Ireland |
+13.0% |
Italy |
-6.5% |
Latvia |
-8.0% |
Liechtenstein |
-8.0% |
Lithuania |
-8.0% |
Luxembourg |
-28.0% |
Malta |
- |
Netherlands |
-6.0% |
Norway |
1.0% |
Poland [4] |
-6.0% |
Portugal |
+27.0% |
Romania [5] |
-8.0% |
Slovakia |
-8.0% |
Slovenia [6] |
-8.0% |
Spain |
+15.0% |
Sweden |
+4.0% |
Turkey |
- |
United Kingdom |
-12.5% |
EU-15 (pre-2004 EU Member States) |
-8.0% |
[1] The base year for Bulgaria is 1988.
[2] In Commission Decision 2006/944/EC determining the respective emission levels allocated to the Community and each of its Member States under the Kyoto Protocol, the respective emission levels were expressed in terms of tonnes of CO2-equivalent. In connection with Council Decision 2002/358/EC, the Council of Environment Ministers and the Commission have, in a joint statement, agreed to take into account inter alia the assumptions in Denmark's statement to the Council Conclusions of 16-17 June 1998 relating to base-year emissions in 2006. In 2006, it was decided to postpone a decision on this until after all Community and Member State initial reports have been reviewed under the Kyoto Protocol.
[3] The base year for Hungary is the average of 1985-1987.
[4] The base year for Poland is 1988.
[5] The base year for Romania is 1989.
[6] The base year for Slovenia is 1986.
Second commitment period (CP2), 2013-2020
The EU, its 28 Member States and Iceland agreed to a joint quantified emission reduction commitment of 80% under the Kyoto Protocol's second commitment period (2013-2020). This is equivalent to a 20 % reduction compared to base-year levels. They also offered to move to a 30 % reduction by 2020, provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and developing countries contribute adequately according to their responsibilities and respective capabilities.
EU GHG targets for 2020
The unilateral 20% GHG reduction target in the context of the EU Climate and Energy Package corresponds to a 14% decrease of emissions between 2005 and 2020. The target is to be achieved both in the sectors covered by the EU ETS (21 % reduction of EU ETS emissions compared to 2005 levels) and in the other sectors covered by national emission targets under the ESD.
The ESD targets used in the indicator are consistent with the EU ETS scope for the third trading period (2013–2020), based on Commission Decision 2013/162/EU of 26 March 2013 on determining Member States' annual emission allocations for the period from 2013 to 2020 pursuant to Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 90, 28.3.2013, p. 106–110) and Commission Implementing Decision 2013/634/EU of 31 October 2013 on the adjustments to Member States’ annual emission allocations for the period from 2013 to 2020 pursuant to Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 292, 1.11.2013, p. 19–22).
The ESD targets (2020 % target compared to 2005 and annual absolute targets consistent with the 2013-2020 ETS scope and GWPs from the IPCC AR2) are presented in the table below:
Country |
2020 target (%) |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
Austria |
-16.0% |
51.6 |
51.0 |
50.5 |
50.0 |
49.5 |
48.9 |
48.4 |
47.9 |
Belgium |
-15.0% |
77.2 |
75.7 |
74.2 |
72.7 |
71.2 |
69.7 |
68.2 |
66.7 |
Bulgaria |
20.0% |
25.6 |
25.8 |
26.0 |
26.3 |
26.5 |
26.8 |
27.0 |
27.2 |
Croatia |
11.0% |
19.0 |
19.2 |
19.4 |
19.6 |
19.8 |
20.0 |
20.2 |
20.4 |
Cyprus |
-5.0% |
5.6 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
Czech Republic |
9.0% |
60.6 |
61.3 |
62.0 |
62.8 |
63.5 |
64.2 |
65.0 |
65.7 |
Denmark |
-20.0% |
35.9 |
35.0 |
34.1 |
33.2 |
32.4 |
31.5 |
30.6 |
29.7 |
Estonia |
11.0% |
6.1 |
6.1 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
Finland |
-16.0% |
31.0 |
30.5 |
30.0 |
29.6 |
29.1 |
28.6 |
28.2 |
27.7 |
France |
-14.0% |
383.1 |
378.7 |
373.9 |
369.2 |
364.4 |
359.6 |
354.9 |
350.1 |
Germany |
-14.0% |
463.8 |
457.2 |
450.6 |
443.9 |
437.3 |
430.6 |
424.0 |
417.3 |
Greece |
-4.0% |
56.9 |
57.1 |
57.4 |
57.7 |
58.0 |
58.3 |
58.6 |
58.9 |
Hungary |
10.0% |
48.9 |
50.0 |
51.1 |
52.2 |
53.3 |
54.4 |
55.5 |
56.6 |
Ireland |
-20.0% |
44.8 |
43.7 |
42.6 |
41.6 |
40.5 |
39.4 |
38.3 |
37.2 |
Italy |
-13.0% |
300.5 |
298.7 |
296.9 |
295.1 |
293.3 |
291.5 |
289.7 |
287.9 |
Latvia |
17.0% |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.2 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
9.5 |
9.6 |
Lithuania |
15.0% |
12.4 |
12.7 |
13.1 |
13.4 |
13.8 |
14.2 |
14.5 |
14.9 |
Luxembourg |
-20.0% |
9.5 |
9.3 |
9.1 |
8.9 |
8.7 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
8.1 |
Malta |
5.0% |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Netherlands |
-16.0% |
119.7 |
117.5 |
115.3 |
113.2 |
111.0 |
108.8 |
106.7 |
104.5 |
Poland |
14.0% |
186.9 |
188.1 |
189.2 |
190.4 |
191.5 |
192.7 |
193.8 |
195.0 |
Portugal |
1.0% |
47.1 |
47.4 |
47.6 |
47.9 |
48.2 |
48.5 |
48.8 |
49.0 |
Romania |
19.0% |
71.6 |
73.3 |
75.0 |
76.7 |
78.5 |
80.2 |
81.9 |
83.6 |
Slovakia |
13.0% |
22.9 |
23.3 |
23.6 |
24.0 |
24.3 |
24.7 |
25.1 |
25.4 |
Slovenia |
4.0% |
11.9 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
Spain |
-10.0% |
220.9 |
219.1 |
217.4 |
215.6 |
213.9 |
212.1 |
210.3 |
208.6 |
Sweden |
-17.0% |
40.8 |
40.2 |
39.6 |
38.9 |
38.3 |
37.7 |
37.0 |
36.4 |
United Kingdom |
-16.0% |
350.2 |
345.8 |
341.4 |
337.0 |
332.7 |
328.3 |
323.9 |
319.5 |
The indicator is based on the official GHG inventories submitted by the EEA countries and the EU to the UNFCCC, as well as on the projected GHG emissions submitted by the Member States under the Monitoring Mechanism Regulation (Regulation 525/2013, MMR).
GHG gases
In line with the UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual inventories, the national inventories cover emissions and removals of the following direct GHGs
- carbon dioxide (CO2),
- methane (CH4),
- nitrous oxide (N2O),
- hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
-perfuorocarbons (PFCs) and
-suphur hexafluoride (SF6)
from six sectors (Energy, Industrial processes, Solvents, Agriculture, LULUCF, Waste).
The gases do not include the greenhouse gases that are also ozone-depleting substances and which are controlled by the Montreal Protocol (see CSI 006). Beginning 2015, emissions of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) shall be included in the national inventories.
Emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) are not included in total GHG emissions presented in the indicator. Unless otherwise mentioned, the indicator does not cover emissions from international bunkers (international aviation and maritime transport), which are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol. In particular, these emissions are not taken into account in the total greenhouse gas emissions reported at national and EU levels.
In order to be aggregated, non-CO2 gases are weighed by their respective global warming potential (GWP) and presented in CO2-equivalent units. GWP are a measure of how much a given mass of greenhouse gas is estimated to contribute to global warming on a 100-year horizon.
In accordance with the UNFCCC rules, the GWP values used in this indicator are the ones used from the IPCC AR2 for the period before 2015 and the ones from IPCC AR4, for the period after 2015:
Gas |
Global warming potential (GWP), values from IPCC AR2 [before 2015] |
Global warming potential (GWP), values from IPCC AR4 [after 2015] |
carbon dioxide (CO2) |
1 |
1 |
methane (CH4) |
21 |
25 |
nitrous oxide (N2O) |
310 |
298 |
sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) |
23900 |
22800 |
nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) |
_ |
17200 |
HFCs and PFCs comprise a large number of different gases that have different GWPs. The full list of GWP can be found in the following links:
- IPCC AR 2: https://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/3825.php
- IPCC AR 4: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html#table-2-14
GHG inventories
For the preparation of their national inventories countries use the methodologies and reporting formats of the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
The IPCC Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC GPG) completed in 2000, complements the 1996 methodologies in all inventory sectors except Land–Use Change and Forestry (LUCF) source categories. In 2004, separate IPCC good practice guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry was developed.
Beginning 2015, Parties shall use the 2006 IPCC Guidelines and formats for the preparation of inventories, reporting emissions in four sectors (Energy, Industrial processes and product use, Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) and Waste).
In the indicator, GHG emissions are attributed to the main emitting sectors at a disaggregated level, following the IPCC definition of source categories and the common reporting format (CRF) followed by Parties. Main references of this kind are:
Projected GHG emissions
For the projected GHG emissions, information submitted by the EEA countries under the MMR is used. The projected GHG emissions referred to in the indicator are the ones reported under the ‘existing measures’ scenario (WEM). Moreover, the separate estimates for the projected ETS and non-ETS emissions are used to assess the distance to the national ESD targets.
ETS emissions
Emissions from the EU ETS are also presented in the indicator. The EU ETS runs in three trading periods: Phase I (2005-2007), Phase II (2008-2012) and Phase III (2013-2020).
In 2013 the scope of the EU ETS was expanded to include additional referring to (a) capture, transport and geological storage of GHG emissions, (b) CO2 emissions from the petrochemicals, ammonia and aluminium production, (c) N2O emissions from the production of nitric, adipidic and glyoxylic acid and (d) PFC emissions from aluminium production. Since 1st January 2012 aviation has also been part of the EU ETS.
Since 2013, these emissions are calculated by the plant operators that fall under the ETS obligations in line with the Regulation No 601/2012, whereas in the Phase II of the EU ETS (years 2008-2012), the monitoring and reporting of the operators was based on the Commission Decision 2004/156/EU.
Croatia has entered the EU ETS Scheme in 1st January 2013.
Approximated GHG inventory
Finally, whenever relevant, this indicator uses data and estimates from the ‘Approximated GHG inventory’ for the year (X-1). These ‘proxy’ inventories are reported by Member States to the EEA and to the Commission under the MMR and are calculated at an aggregated level on the basis of the national and international information available for the year (X-1).
GHG inventories (years 1990-(X-2)):
The indicator is based on the information reported by Member States under the MMR. However, in case a Member State does not submit the inventory data required to compile the Union inventory, the Commission shall prepare estimates to complete the GHG inventories submitted by Member States in consultation and close cooperationwith the Member States concerned. In this case the Member State shall use the gap-filled inventory in its official submission to the UNFCCC. The basis of this gap-filling processes are described in the Commission Delegated Regulation of 12.03.2014 (http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/g-gas/monitoring/docs/c_2014_1539_en.pdf )
Approximated GHG inventory (year X-1):
Under the MMR, the Commission shall also estimate a Member State’s approximated GHG inventory if the Member States fails to provide it. These estimates are provided by the EEA and are country-specific. More information on the methodology used for the gap-filling is provided in the ‘Approximated GHG inventory report’ of each year.
Projected GHG emissions (year X – 2020):
In order to ensure timeliness, completeness, consistency, comparability, accuracy and transparency of the reporting of projections by the EU and its Member States, the quality of the reported projections is assessed by the ETC/ACM on behalf of the EEA. In certain cases, projections were adjusted to ensure full consistency with historic GHG emission data from the latest GHG inventories and missing data was gap-filled by the ETC/ACM.
GHG inventories
(a) Difference of methodologies between countries
Since Member States use different national methodologies, national activity data or country-specific emission factors in accordance with IPCC and UNFCCC guidelines, these different methodologies are reflected in the Union GHG inventory data. The EU believes that it is consistent with the UNFCCC reporting guidelines and the IPCC good practice guidelines to use different methodologies for one source category across the EU territory especially if this helps to reduce uncertainty and improve consistency of the emissions data provided that each methodology is consistent with the IPCC good practice guidelines. At the same time the EU is putting effort to promote and support the use of higher tier methodologies across Member States. At EU level and for most of the key categories of the Union inventory, more than 75% of the EU-15 emissions are calculated using higher tier methodologies, resulting in lower uncertainty rates.
(b) GWP
According to the IPCC, the GWP values used in the IPCC 4AR have an uncertainty of ±35% for the 5 to 95% (90%) confidence range.
Projected GHG emissions
The methodology proposed consists in simple additions of data reported by Member States. However, uncertainty arises from the following:
Several countries carry out sensitivity analyses on their projections.
Approximated GHG Inventory
The uncertainty ranges estimated in the approximated GHG inventories are derived by comparing the official national data submitted to the UNFCCC in year X with the proxy estimates of the same year. The uncertainty for the approximated emissions at Union level is estimated as the weighted mean of the differences described: weighted again by the relative contribution that each Member State makes to total EU‑15 and EU‑28 emissions. More details about these methodologies are provided in the ‘Approximated GHG inventory report’ of each year.
The IPCC Good Practice Guidance, which is consistent with the Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, as well as the 2006 IPCC Guidelines provide approaches on how Parties should estimate uncertainties, suggesting different values for the uncertainty of activity data (AD) and emission factors (EF) for most of the emissions source categories. On the basis of this guidance EU Member States and other EEA countries perform their own assessment into uncertainty of reported data and provide in the National Inventory Report an uncertainty analysis to account for the uncertainty per source category, as well as the total uncertainty of their national inventory.
The annual Union GHG inventory report provides a section (1.7) on the uncertainty evaluation, describing the methodology used to estimate it. The results suggest that the level uncertainty in the EU-15 is about 8% for total GHG emissions.
Total EU-28 and EU-15 GHG emission trends are likely to be more accurate than the individual absolute annual emission estimates, because the annual values are not independent of each other. The IPCC suggests that the uncertainty in total GHG emission trends is ~ 4 to 5%. For the EU, the trend uncertainty estimated is close to 1%. The total GHG emission estimates are quite reliable and the limited number of interpolations used to build the indicator do not introduce much uncertainty at the EU level.
Uncertainties in the projections of GHG emissions can be significant but have not been assessed.
The IPCC AR4 (IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 'Climate Change 2007') emphasizes that:
Words in bold represent calibrated expressions of uncertainty and confidence. Relevant terms are explained in the Box 'Treatment of uncertainty' in the Introduction of the AR4 Synthesis Report. In particular, a likelihood 'very likely' corresponds to a probability of occurence higher than 90 %. This uncertainty in specific outcomes is assessed using expert judgment and statistical analysis of a body of evidence (e.g. observations or model results).
The high confidence in the responsibility of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for the warming of the climate system reemphasizes the relevance of monitoring and assessing greenhouse gas emission trends in Europe.
For references, please go to https://eea.europa.eu./data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-5/assessment or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 22 Nov 2024, 06:55 PM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others