All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesKey messages: Environmental justice demands that environmental policies are built to ensure fair treatment, yet pollutants disproportionately impact deprived or vulnerable communities which develop higher health risks. Human biomonitoring (HBM) shows the social disparities of internal exposure to S-phenylmercapturic acid (SPMA) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), emphasising the need for targeted actions and awareness, especially in vulnerable communities. Integrating environmental justice principles into the goals of the Zero Pollution Action Plan would strengthen the EU’s ambition to reduce health inequalities and create a non-toxic environment.
SPMA in urine and PFOA in blood plasma of children aged 3-17 years old in Germany, 2014-2017

Why is pollution an environmental justice issue?
Environmental justice aims to reduce inequalities in terms of health risks, resources and decision-making for environmental and health-related issues. It is an important issue as pollutants are often unfairly distributed in society (Dreger et al., 2019; Fairburn et al., 2019). It is well known that, for example, deprived and marginalised communities can be more exposed to pollutants due to factors such as proximity to busy streets or industrial sites (Valencia et al., 2023) and so have higher rates of related health effects (Deguen and Zmirou-Navier, 2010). Thus, targeted action is required to protect Europe’s most vulnerable residents (EEA, 2019).
Human biomonitoring reveals unequal exposure to environmental pollutants
HBM can reveal social disparities in exposure to environmental pollutants within large-scale population studies by quantifying pollutants found in samples such as blood or urine. Comparing HBM data across different sub-groups of the population, for example by socio-economic position, reflects inequalities likely associated with social factors.
Figure displays the results of the German Environmental Survey for Children and Adolescents 2014-17 (GerES V) (Duffek et al.,2020 and Schwedler et al.,2021). Stratified by socio-economic position, the chart compares concentrations of two chemical pollutants measured in children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years: (1) S-phenylmercapturic acid (SPMA) in urine (µg/L), and (2) perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in blood plasma (µg/L). SPMA is an established biomarker of exposure to benzene (Pluym et al., 2015), a carcinogenic and mutagenic substance. Benzene is found within car exhaust, so road traffic is a key emission source. Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) is one of the best-known representatives of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl compounds (PFAS), so-called ‘eternal chemicals’ which have persistent and bioaccumulative properties that can affect human development and fertility (ATSDR, 2021). One use of PFOA is within product coatings.
Young people with a low socio-economic position show higher SPMA levels than those in a higher socio-economic group. This finding is in line with the bulk of research indicating that socially-deprived groups are disproportionately affected by pollutants; for instance, those found within indoor air. But there are also exceptions to this general tendency: children and adolescents with upper socio-economic positions have on average higher levels of PFOA than those with lower socio-economic positions (Duffek et al., 2020; Murawski et al., 2023). Certain behaviours like more frequent and longer breastfeeding of children and differences in food consumption patterns are possible explanations for this reverse social gradient (Duffek et al.,2020 and Schwedler et al.,2021).
Zero-pollution ambition’s potential to strengthen environmental justice
Both examples illustrate how socio-economic position affects exposure to environmental pollutants. More targeted progress towards zero pollution must focus on people with higher exposure and raise awareness for deprived communities.
Strengthening the social dimension of the EU’s zero-pollution ambition can build upon Flagship 1 of the Zero Pollution Action Plan by reducing health inequalities caused by social factors.
Flagship 5 (Enforcing Zero Pollution together) emphasises the need for a better cross-sectoral view of pollution. Here, consideration of social aspects could support collaborative action. This applies especially to pollutant-related regulation and research that takes into account population inequalities and particularly vulnerable groups (EEA, 2022).
Since socially unequal distributions of pollutants manifest throughout various sectors, the zero-pollution ambition needs to be considered in all policy areas. Integrating the guiding principle of environmental justice in the zero-pollution ambition could help mitigate impacts on health and well-being, becoming a powerful tool in creating a non-toxic environment for all.
Please consult the relevant indicators and signals below for a more comprehensive overview on the topic.
References and footnotes
- Duffek, A., et al., 2020, ‘Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in blood plasma - Results of the German Environmental Survey for children and adolescents 2014-2017 (GerES V)’, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 228, p. 113549 (DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113549).a b
- Schwedler, G., Murawski, A., Schmied-Tobies, M.I.H., Rucic, E., Scherer, M., Pluym, N., Scherer, G., Bethke, R., Kolossa-Gehring, M., 2021, ‘Benzene metabolite SPMA and acrylamide metabolites AAMA and GAMA in urine of children and adolescents in Germany – human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey 2014 2017 (GerES V)’ Environmental Research,192. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110295a
- Dreger, S., et al., 2019, ‘Social Inequalities in Environmental Noise Exposure: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(6), p. 1011 (DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16061011).a b
- Fairburn, J., et al., 2019, ‘Social Inequalities in Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution: A Systematic Review in the WHO European Region’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(17), p. 3127 (DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173127).↵
- Valencia, A., et al., 2023, ‘A hyperlocal hybrid data fusion near-road PM2.5 and NO2 annual risk and environmental justice assessment across the United States’, PloS One 18(6), p. e0286406 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286406).↵
- ↵EEA, 2019, ' More action needed to protect Europe’s most vulnerable citizens from air pollution, noise and extreme temperatures', European Environment Agency (https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/protect-vulnerable-citizens) accessed 28 August 2024.
- Pluym, N. et al., 2015, 'Analysis of 18 urinary mercapturic acids by two high-throughput multiplex-LC-MS/MS methods', Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 407(18), pp. 5463-5476 (DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8719-x).↵
- ↵ATSDR, 2021, ‘Toxicological profile for Perfluoroalkyls’, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/ToxProfiles/ToxProfiles.aspx?id=1117&tid=237) accessed 28 August 2024.
- ↵Murawski, A., et al., 2023, Deutsche Umweltstudie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen 2014-2017 (GerES V), Umwelt & Gesundheit No 02/2023, Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau (http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/deutsche-umweltstudie-zur-gesundheit-von-kindern-0).
- ↵EEA, 2022, 'Air signals' (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/zero-pollution/health/signals/air/#vulnerable) accessed 28 August 2024.
- EU, 2022, Decision 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030 (OJ L 114, 12.4.2022, p. 22–36).↵